From owner-cvs-share  Sun Mar 30 21:01:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-share>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA15199
          for cvs-share-outgoing; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 21:01:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15177;
          Sun, 30 Mar 1997 21:01:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id OAA27992; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 14:57:24 +1000
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 14:57:24 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199703310457.OAA27992@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: obrien@NUXI.com, peter@spinner.dialix.com
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/doc/handbook policies.sgml
Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-share@freefall.freebsd.org, obrien@freefall.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-cvs-share@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> I'd have preferred them to be up a directory level out of the vendor
>> files altogether..  (eg: src/contrib/cvs/* and src/contrib/cvs.README)
>
>I'll move them like this if that is what people think is a Good Thing.
>Consenses?

I like moving them out of the vendor directories, but xxx.README would
clutter the contrib directory.  Putting them in the build directories
together with the Makefiles would be clean but puts them too far away
from the sources that they refer to - same as the Makefiles are too far
away :-(.

Bruce