From owner-freebsd-sparc Sat Nov 9 14:54:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A57F37B401 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:54:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADBB843E3B for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 14:54:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tmoestl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 27888 invoked by uid 0); 9 Nov 2002 22:54:28 -0000 Received: from p5086febf.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO forge.local) (80.134.254.191) by mail.gmx.net (mp020-rz3) with SMTP; 9 Nov 2002 22:54:28 -0000 Received: from tmm by forge.local with local (Exim 4.10 #1) id 18AeUr-00014j-00; Sat, 09 Nov 2002 23:54:33 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 23:54:32 +0100 From: Thomas Moestl To: Udo Erdelhoff Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sparc64/ebus ebus.c src/sys/sparc64/include ofw_bus.h ver.h src/sys/sparc64/isa isa.c src/sys/sparc64/pci ofw_pci.c ofw_pci.h psycho.c src/sys/sparc64/sparc64 machdep.c ofw_bus.c Message-ID: <20021109225432.GC316@crow.dom2ip.de> Mail-Followup-To: Udo Erdelhoff , freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.org References: <200211071607.gA7G7kXF023424@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021109153314.GX59222@nathan.ruhr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021109153314.GX59222@nathan.ruhr.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 2002/11/09 at 16:33:14 +0100, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:07:46AM -0800, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > Add two new workaround for firmware anomalies: > > 1. At least some Netra t1 models have PCI buses with no associated > > interrupt map, but obviously expect the PCI swizzle to be done with > > the interrupt number from the higher level as intpin. > > Is this perhaps a side effect of the hardware difference between > the older Netra t1 100/105 and the newer Netra t1 AC/DC 200? I > have used both models at work and the differences are significant. > Starting with with CPU: > > Netra t1 105: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine > Netra t1 AC 200: SUNW,UltraAX-i2 This workaround is currently only enabled for the former model (the decision is based on the board type string); it's better to be careful here, as I'm quite sure that this would break other models if enabled unconditionally. > Holler if you need addtional data as long it is available from inside > Solaris - I cannot take these boxes down. The output of 'ptrconf -vp' on the second machine would be interesting, it wouldn't be enough to tell for sure whether that anomaly is present there, too, however. Thanks, - Thomas -- Thomas Moestl http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0015675/ http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tmm/ PGP fingerprint: 1C97 A604 2BD0 E492 51D0 9C0F 1FE6 4F1D 419C 776C To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message