From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Sep 10 10:43:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.sunesi.net (ns1.sunesi.net [196.15.192.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B369C37B422; Sun, 10 Sep 2000 10:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbm by ns1.sunesi.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 13YB8W-000Kop-00; Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:43:24 +0200 Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:43:24 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: kosmos Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , Steve Price , Will Andrews , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: PortsNG (was Re: Ports Options Paper) Message-ID: <20000910194324.A80015@mithrandr.moria.org> References: <20000910161036.A79024@mithrandr.moria.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from kosmos@bowhill.yi.org on Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 10:02:48AM -0700 Organization: Sunesi Clinical Systems X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386 X-URL: http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~nbm/ Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun 2000-09-10 (10:02), kosmos wrote: > > On Sun 2000-09-10 (01:30), Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > > > But I'm not sure if this is the right thing to do for ordinary users. > > > (I added it just for quick testing -- it's not even documented.) The > > > problem here is that we don't know whether the user wants BAR_1 to be > > > deleted or not. Maybe the user is using something in BAR_1 and didn't > > > realize typing "make deinstall-depends" from FOO would delete it. > > > > When installing a port/package directly, touch > > /var/db/pkg/foo-1.0/direct, if not, don't touch it. Well, a better name > > would be cool, but that should work fine. > > > Something like that would make sense if the user ordered the package to be > installed explicitly. But the problem is not to delete anything that the > user *might* be using. There is really no way to do this automatically. > > Suppose BAR_1 is a dependency of FOO, and the user decides he > wants to keep it. Later, he decides that FOO is just taking up drive > space, so he runs deinstall-depends - and BAR_1 gets deleted too. > > Also, isn't this function indirectly handled by +REQUIRED_BY? Not quite. You cut off my other paragraph, which maybe didn't make sense. The user can change the 'direct' or "keep me even if everything that depends on me disappears" flag to on or off either manually, or through some CUI/GUI tool (still to be written). Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message