From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 16:01:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8726937B401 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC65C43FB1 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:01:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6FN1Lv1000471; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:01:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6FN1L0O000470; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:01:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:01:21 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Stefan Farfeleder Message-ID: <20030715230121.GA329@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <20030715220630.GH574@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030715220630.GH574@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diff to fix GCC build problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:01:31 -0000 On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:06:30AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > SRCS+= ${GCC_CPU}.c > +.if exists(${GCC_CPU}-c.c) > +SRCS+= ${GCC_CPU}-c.c > +.endif > + I haven't tested it, but the patch should be harmless. The file (ia64-c.c) contains support for ``#pragma builtin'', which is an HP contributed feature to better support their libm. The support functions have to be registered before they are used and that happens in hpux.h. Assuming that we steer clear from that header, all we would have on ia64 is the compilation of a source file that's not going to be used. Feel free to pass this on to kan@, he's the one that ultimately makes the change. I don't see a problem. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net