From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 15 14:04:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2886106566B for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 14:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF588FC0A for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 14:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SqPR8-0003Om-61 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 07:04:38 -0700 Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 07:04:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1342361078180-5727066.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1342359546590-5727055.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1342359546590-5727055.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Clang '-g' unused warnings in FreeBSD (linking) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 14:04:38 -0000 Maybe I should include a question too, so I have better chance of getting answer :) Is this intended behaviour? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Clang-g-unused-warnings-in-FreeBSD-linking-tp5727055p5727066.html Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.