From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Dec  8 17:46: 0 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758)
	id C2BE31536B; Wed,  8 Dec 1999 17:45:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B70C51CD736; Wed,  8 Dec 1999 17:45:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 17:45:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>,
	Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com>,
	Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>,
	freebsd-chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Yahoo hacked last night
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991208182954.048a3460@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912081744550.22106-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Brett Glass wrote:

> No, you just have to be willing to take a hit of about 60 cycles
> per function call, worst case. The thing is, with clock speeds 
> ready to hit 1 MHz, this is getting to be a trivial amount of 
> overhead.

I know what you meant, but my Apple II hit that barrier 20 years ago ;-)

Kris



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message