Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 17:45:59 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com>, Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, freebsd-chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Yahoo hacked last night Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912081744550.22106-100000@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991208182954.048a3460@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > No, you just have to be willing to take a hit of about 60 cycles > per function call, worst case. The thing is, with clock speeds > ready to hit 1 MHz, this is getting to be a trivial amount of > overhead. I know what you meant, but my Apple II hit that barrier 20 years ago ;-) Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9912081744550.22106-100000>