From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 13 04:45:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3B137B401 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 04:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kai.qix.co.uk (kai.qix.co.uk [195.149.39.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5AD43FA3 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 04:45:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aledm@qix.co.uk) Received: from localhost (aledm@localhost) by kai.qix.co.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h4DBjoR09988 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 12:45:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from aledm@qix.co.uk) Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 12:45:50 +0100 (BST) From: Aled Morris To: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20030513123207.02e95660@popserver.sfu.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: A modest proposal for better errno values... X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:45:53 -0000 On Tue, 13 May 2003, Colin Percival wrote: > If I understand the purpose of this error code, it deals with cases >where data is in an invalid state. In that case, why not make the error code > EASSERT /* An assertion has failed */ EDONTPANIC /* a panic has been averted */ Aled