From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 27 21:29:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA06970 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:29:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA06961; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:29:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA07012; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:29:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Short on space at ftp.freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 Apr 1998 20:58:27 PDT." <199804280358.UAA18259@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:29:36 -0700 Message-ID: <7008.893737776@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Very well, I just thought I'd give you a last chance to argue for their preservation. Consider them nuked, Herr Portsmeister! ;-) > * Can we eliminate ports-2.2.5 and packages-2.2.5 under pub/FreeBSD? We > * could use the space and you can always make symlinks if you're trying > * to stay compat with people's compiled-in versions for /sys/sysinstall. > > I think we should simply remove them. We don't have the releases > themselves on ftp anymore, and a symlink to binaries compiled for a > different version of an OS just doesn't seem the right thing to do. > > Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message