From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 19 19:06:19 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5FEAF16A4CE; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:06:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 760D843D48; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:06:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hood.oook.cz (localhost.oook.cz [127.0.0.1])
	by hood.oook.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2JJ6HxV039399
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:06:17 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from pav@localhost)
	by hood.oook.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j2JJ6HUC039398;
	Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:06:17 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hood.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org
	using -f
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Boris B. Samorodov" <bsam@ipt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20050319190257.GC2879@ipt.ru>
References: <20050318232204.GA21446@ipt.ru> <20050319182531.GA2879@ipt.ru>
	 <20050319190257.GC2879@ipt.ru>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KGpUwVNVsQIOquZYEXlx"
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:06:15 +0100
Message-Id: <1111259175.93103.20.camel@hood.oook.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [partially solved] gtk20 problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:06:19 -0000


--=-KGpUwVNVsQIOquZYEXlx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Boris B. Samorodov p=ED=B9e v so 19. 03. 2005 v 22:02 +0300:
> Hi!
>=20
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:25:31PM +0300, Boris B. Samorodov wrote:
> >=20
> > My investigation showed that pango was installed on my system
> > and libXft wasn't. Howewer installing libXft doesn't resolve
> > the problem. Only reinstalling pango *after* installing libXft
> > does it. Gtk20 needs pango-with-xft.
>=20
> OOPS! Pango nowadays depends on libXft!!
> My fault, didn't notice it.
>=20
> But how did it come about, that I had pango without libXft?
> Maybe very old installation?
>=20
> Anyway the question is how to deal with such a case?
> Maybe an item at UPDATING?

If you followed the GNOME update instructions in UPDATING, you should
have new pango as of few days ago.

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep
the rabbit hole goes....

--=-KGpUwVNVsQIOquZYEXlx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCPHgnntdYP8FOsoIRAkv/AJsFlfeSAgGBObVtjvvlpKtK1+jPxgCePfGQ
g/bGmoO4Kmwajct4Nq/XkY0=
=ixCC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-KGpUwVNVsQIOquZYEXlx--