From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Thu Aug 30 23:24:09 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACE4EFBC82 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9045B770E0 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 42658EFBC80; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F81EEFBC7F for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0CC4770DC for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103E01A81C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7UNO6nj093297 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w7UNO69a093296 for emulation@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230986] www/linux-flashplayer: Separate c6 and c7? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rkoberman@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:24:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230986 --- Comment #8 from rkoberman@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jason W. Bacon from comment #6) Your point is valid, but this is the wrong forum as the problem is the packaging system. It expects to install a package on a system that has the exact versions of all dependencies that were used to build the package. Thi= s is important as it assures that there will be no differences that might impact= the performance of the package. and, of course, the packaging system assumes th= at the latest default dependencies are used. In the case of linux packages, that means c6 for 10 and 11. It seems likely that c7 might become the default at come point, hopefully in the near futur= e. Until that happens, I can't see any resolution of this problem. For me it w= ould mean using c6 and at least two ports that have vulnerabilities that I was informed were unlikely to be fixed in c6. (That was as of at least a year a= go, so may be no longer true.) Sorry, but I don't think that there is a solution available. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=