Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 22:12:19 +1300 From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> To: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> Cc: "arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: native toolchain for freestanding apps Message-ID: <20120304221219.434706ca@fubar.geek.nz> In-Reply-To: <EE178EB5-3469-405A-9938-9ADE3B771F02@kientzle.com> References: <23CB6C35-9450-40BA-9FA3-37C44B328CA8@freebsd.org> <CABt%2Bj0mB4w==h_SQ4YyDM24_wGOjcdZDK9T1N3DqjSkap0VkQw@mail.gmail.com> <E8A24EBE-967D-44F8-A884-3207B3C6F0FE@bsdimp.com> <8042D895-3B3D-431E-ADCC-A150BDC838ED@kientzle.com> <890D6B89-8031-496C-A5A2-A2836369F765@FreeBSD.org> <A68B207A-2754-4222-A30B-FDBD143A03D5@kientzle.com> <88338819-70CF-4BA7-92AE-95864F159FF4@FreeBSD.org> <3206B98F-E9F1-4758-9741-AF29FE7CCBFA@kientzle.com> <EE178EB5-3469-405A-9938-9ADE3B771F02@kientzle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 00:40:06 -0800 Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> wrote: > On Mar 3, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > >> On Mar 3, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> 2) Missing div/mod functions in ARM libgcc. > >>> > >> > >> Hmm, maybe they are disabled because libc supplies them? > > > > If I copy the various div/mod object files from libc.a into > > libgcc.a, then u-boot compiles ... > > > > Is there any compelling reason they can't be in both places? Have you tried to build a FreeBSD binary when both lots of symbols are provided? If it links properly then I can't think of any reason we couldn't provide both. The compiler-rt versions are hidden so shouldn't be exposed. > Here's the patch for libcompiler_rt (aka libgcc.a) that just includes > an extra copy of the numeric routines (duplicating the ones in libc). > > With this, I'm now able to build u-boot (and other freestanding > programs) using the FreeBSD xdev tools on ARM. > > Any comments? I have done the same with the ARM EABI support as compiler-rt provides the required __aeabi_* symbols. This will mean with it's support the libc versions are unneeded. Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120304221219.434706ca>