From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Jan 23 16:01:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA21240
          for isp-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 16:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lserver.infoworld.com (lserver.infoworld.com [192.216.48.4])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA21203;
          Thu, 23 Jan 1997 16:00:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Brett_Glass@infoworld.com
Received: from ccgate.infoworld.com (ccgate.infoworld.com [192.216.49.101]) 
  by lserver.infoworld.com (8.8.4/8.8.4/GNAC-GW-2.1) with SMTP id PAA07640; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ccMail by ccgate.infoworld.com (SMTPLINK V2.11)
	id AA854063640; Thu, 23 Jan 97 16:38:35 PST
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 97 16:38:35 PST
Message-Id: <9700238540.AA854063640@ccgate.infoworld.com>
To: Allen Hyer <allenh@wtrt.net>, gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu,
        lenc@earth.infinetconsulting.com
Cc: spork@super-g.com, batie@agora.rdrop.com, drussell@internode.net,
        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 56K vs X2?
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> since the originating data was straight PCM codes, the digital to analog
> conversion should theoretically not change the data.

Even if you send straight PCM codes, you have no control over bit robbing
on switched circuits. (You can get DEDICATED clear channel T1, but to my
knowledge, you can't rely on clear channel through a phone switch.)

--Brett