From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 24 22:13:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA13910 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 22:13:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA13902 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 22:13:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA07347; Fri, 24 Oct 1997 22:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 22:13:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Font cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: option NETATALK in 2.2.5R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Font wrote: > FYI: > > I added "option NETATALK" to a kernel configuration file that, aside from > having a number of network and disk devices commented out, was > substantially unchanged from GENERIC. This resulted in a kernel file that > was 2512988 bytes, a much larger number than was expected (GENERIC is > 1457189). This resulting kernel file hung as soon as the kernel was > loaded (it never got to process -c flags). I haven't yet compiled the > netatalk software itself on this system (P200, 32M, 3C509, wd0 only). I can't say I'm having the same problem. I'm running a well changed GENERIC with NETATALK. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major