From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 03:47:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDF616A418 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C3113C45D for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2008 22:47:15 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OKO38304; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:47:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2008 22:46:11 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18355.47550.877454.107973@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:47:10 -0500 To: Erik Osterholm In-Reply-To: <20080213221453.GA7159@aleph.cepheid.org> References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <200802112304.09906.jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za> <47B1F890.1090408@chuckr.org> <200802130943.22177.jonathan@hst.org.za> <47B344D9.4020406@chuckr.org> <20080213163421.165aaf84@scorpio> <20080213221453.GA7159@aleph.cepheid.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what happened to linuxflashplugin? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:47:18 -0000 Erik Osterholm writes: > - Petition Adobe to release an official version and/or reduce the > phantom restrictions[1] on the binaries so that they can run > under emulation. I don't have the link at hand, but Adobe is supposedly working woth open source folks so the next generation of Flash will have an open interface specification. Robert Huff