From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 12 13:42:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5141065677; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:42:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200903111233.14029.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <200903111507.42241.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <1236836518.1651.0.camel@wombat.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <1236836518.1651.0.camel@wombat.2hip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200903120942.44149.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Robert Noland Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:42:59 -0000 On Thursday 12 March 2009 01:41 am, Robert Noland wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 15:07 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 02:52 pm, Robert Noland wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in > > > > next few days unless a showstopper is found or > > > > "over-my-dead-body" type of review is received. ;-) > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff > > > > > > > > FYI, it was originally posted here: > > > > > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim > > > > > > > > and here: > > > > > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim > > > > > > > > Please read the original threads for more information about > > > > the patch. > > > > > > Does this address SMP as well? Or is that still hanging out in > > > the wind? > > > > Yes, it does. > > Cool, looking forward to it... Wait a minute. Are you talking about SMP i386? If so, the answer to that question is no although it will be relatively easy to do fix after the patch. This patch only address UP/SMP amd64. Jung-uk Kim