Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:55:12 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/172600: [PKGNG]sysutils/bacula-client & sysutils/bacula-server conflict and shouldn't Message-ID: <df73f10c74395e7e2b914faf91ee565e@webmail.lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <c11fb13f8825e1dc19ab2af6454e3153@mail.unixathome.org> References: <201301031245.r03Cj8fm045924@freefall.freebsd.org> <b9ab1d9a6481192685a164a194017da6@webmail.lerctr.org> <50E5AD5D.8020402@yandex.ru> <c11fb13f8825e1dc19ab2af6454e3153@mail.unixathome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-01-03 10:37, Dan Langille wrote: > On 2013-01-03 11:10, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: >> Thank you for quick reply! >> >> Larry Rosenman wrote on 03.01.2013 19:52: >>> ===> Running ldconfig >>> /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib >>> ===> Registering installation for bacula-client-5.2.12 >>> Installing bacula-client-5.2.12...pkg: bacula-client-5.2.12 >>> conflicts >>> with bacula-server-5.2.12 (installs files into the same place). >>> Problematic file: /usr/local/man/man8/bacula-fd.8.gz >> >> It's quite odd, because this file is installed only if >> WITH_CLIENT_ONLY is enabled. Can't it be some pkg cached result or >> something? Would you please try to set PORTREVISION to 1 in >> bacula-server/Makefile and try again? If this helps, > > Larry: FYI: bacula-server now installs bacula-client as a LIB_DEPENDS > > Thus, after installing bacula-server, bacula-client should already be > installed. > > Does that help? > > Ahh, yes, we did not bump the PORTREVISION. I think we should have. > Let me know > if a bump helps. Reinstalling bacula-server has bacula-client still fail...... > >>> Yes, it still seems to be broken, there is a pending PR to fix it, >>> but >>> AFAIK it has NOT been committed yet. >> >> This one, that I closed today? >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170773 > > No, this PR committed in Dec: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/167700 > >> I believe it's no more applicable to current port state and >> something >> similar is done in current bacula ports anyway. > > I do not understand the above statement.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?df73f10c74395e7e2b914faf91ee565e>