Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:18:17 +0100 (CET)
From:      Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To:        Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr>
Cc:        Pierre Beyssac <pb@fasterix.frmug.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Krzysztof J?druczyk <beaker@hot.pl>, <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Subject:   Re: Wine-2002.10.07 port on FreeBSD 5.0-current
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.44.0211081411050.74479-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
In-Reply-To: <20021108140401.A44559@bofh.enst.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> Fine, but if included "as is" in Wine because, it will break
> compatibility with Net/OpenBSD because DBREG_DRX is a FreeBSDism...
> that's why I surrounded my patch with a #ifdef DBREG_DRX (which
> seems cleaner than a #ifdef __FreeBSD__).

Sheesh.

PHK, now we have the situation where user programs require #ifdefs
to be portable among the BSDs when this was not required before.

Please consider reverting

  revision 1.28
  date: 2002/10/20 20:48:56;  author: phk;  state: Exp;  lines: +6 -9
  Change the definition of the debugging registers to be an array, so
  that we can index into it, rather than do pointer gymnastics on a
  structure containing 8 elements.

in src/sys/i386/include/reg.h.

Gerald

PS: Pierre, thanks a lot for spotting and addressing this! I certainly
agree with preferring #ifdef DBREG_DRX over #ifdef __FreeBSD__.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.44.0211081411050.74479-100000>