Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:07:12 +0100 From: Anthony Campbell <ac@acampbell.uk> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Permissions problem for sane Message-ID: <20150812130712.GH29542@ithaca.acampbell.uk> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508100954260.22775@wonkity.com> References: <20150806104335.GA27748@ithaca.acampbell.uk> <1876444.Yqz8SnZpVd@desk8.phess.net> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508061514330.24695@wonkity.com> <CAJ-Vmom%2BgG9b1imVzL9nx6HQmTSHr0n8WXg%2B7J7VksgAhHyO5g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508100954260.22775@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 Aug 2015, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > >Why isn't this the default behaviour for the saned package? Would it > >be possible to make it just be said default behaviour? > > Running a network daemon rather than just changing permissions? That's > probably why. Can't say what the problem is for the OP, but I know for a > fact that it works with the permissions right. My 1640SU has been in use > for years that way. Just to say that I finally got the permissions change to work. I hadn't edited /etc/rc.conf to enable the ruleset in //etc/devfs.rules. -- Anthony Campbell http://www.acampbell.uk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150812130712.GH29542>