From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 17 9: 8: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A905A156E6; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:07:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA63193; Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:07:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 09:07:56 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199912171707.JAA63193@apollo.backplane.com> To: Garrett Wollman Cc: Mike Smith , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Serious server-side NFS problem References: <199912170328.TAA57721@apollo.backplane.com> <199912170855.AAA00646@mass.cdrom.com> <199912171557.KAA46338@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :< said: : :> the IP and UDP checksum guessing, but more that I think you'll find that :> a considerable amount of the inbound NFS traffic handling is actually :> performed in the interrupt context : :If it is, then there is a serious bug. : :-GAWollman : :-- :Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same No serious NFS traffic handling is done in the interrupt context. The packets are essentially just queued up for nfsd to deal with. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message