From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 22:16:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E892A16A427 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:16:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B06843D8E for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:15:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA7MFrEZ097315; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:15:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <436FD219.6070505@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:15:53 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Khera References: <436F69DB.8060408@samsco.org> <436FB7B1.2050205@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64 List Subject: Re: amd64 does not see all 4 GB RAM on tyan GT24 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:16:08 -0000 Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote: > >> Hi there, same board/server (different opteron), 4 GB, only 3 GB too >> (havent got access to BIOS atm to check what it sees, but pretty sure >> it was more than 3 GB). Running first version of BIOS code, will be >> updating it soon and will let u know if that makes any difference. > > > There was a discussion about this problem on this very list around > mid-august. Check the archives for "BIOS memory hole" This is a larger hole than I would expect, though. That's why I was interested in getting the SMAP table from this machine. Not sure why his verbose output didn't include it. Scott