From owner-freebsd-net Fri May 17 12:32:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net (harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B2237B40D; Fri, 17 May 2002 12:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pool0392.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.199.137] helo=mindspring.com) by harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 178nST-0003Jv-00; Fri, 17 May 2002 12:32:09 -0700 Message-ID: <3CE55A9B.73EA3DE4@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:31:39 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Attila Nagy Cc: Adrian Penisoara , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ALTQ integration developer preview References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Attila Nagy wrote: > Although I'm not a coder myself, I would also look for the way to patch > the "em" driver (if "gx" is already in the initial plan), because it > reportedly works better (for example I couldn't do NFS serving with UDP > packets bigger than the MTU with that, while the "em" driver works OK). ??? It *does* frag packets bigger than the MTU, right? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message