From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr 18 12:25:30 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA15251
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:25:30 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA15244
          ; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:25:28 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu
cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, ache@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org,
        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bash removed from master site? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Apr 95 11:22:13 EDT."
             <9504181522.AA07591.SM@odin.INS.CWRU.Edu> 
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:25:28 -0700
Message-ID: <15243.798233128@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'm not sure why you're trying to auto-fetch a beta version of bash.
> The official current version is in pub/dist/bash-1.14.4.tar.gz on
> slc2.ins.cwru.edu.

OK, by now you've probably seen my subsequent commit which moved it
over to LOCAL_PORTS.  If slc2.ins.cwru.edu is indeed bash's "official"
home, and I can count on 1.14.4 hanging out there until some long
interval after the next version is out (e.g. I'd like to see a long
window in which to upgrade the port before it gets shot out of the
saddle by the tarball going away) then I'll happily change it back.
Should I?

					Jordan