Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:50:58 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: Luk van den Borne <luktheluckyboy@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Amarok + postgreSQL version Message-ID: <200511131451.06120.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <7b1df2440511130408g1d36e9d0t@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b1df2440511111423u7495a644k@mail.gmail.com> <200511131006.55962.lofi@freebsd.org> <7b1df2440511130408g1d36e9d0t@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2250529.nDxFqex1ie Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 13. November 2005 13:08, Luk van den Borne wrote: > 2005/11/13, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>: > > On Sunday, 13. November 2005 09:45, Luk van den Borne wrote: > > > When I deinstall postgresql74-server and try install > > > postgresql81-server, I get this message: > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D> postgresql-server-8.1.0 is marked as broken: the port wan= ts > > > postgresql81-client but you have postgresql74-client installed. > > > > > > So I guess the version numbers do have to match. At least according to > > > ports. > > > > Ah, you're running the server on the same machine. I assumed the host y= ou > > were trying to run amarok on was client-only. > > > > -- > > ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org > > (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org > > \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org > > But that shouldn't really matter, should it? If I can run a different > client remotely I should also be able to run another client locally, > right? Or what is the philosophy behind this setup? My guess is that it's a more of a packaging problem than a philosophy=20 (postgresql comes as one big sourcecode archive and the client and server=20 parts have interdependencies at buildtime).=20 > That locally server and client version should match, in order to > guarantee 100% compatibility (iow: admins should never be locked out > in case of an unforseen interface breakage?). Perhaps. > Or is it just a small bug in the Makefile? Perhaps that, too. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart2250529.nDxFqex1ie Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDd0TJXhc68WspdLARAjCpAJ9HPE47ywK69FeuCgN9AN+d81KlFwCbBTUg +uKsmuFCfVvw3hyYmYYAVJQ= =e2GL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2250529.nDxFqex1ie--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511131451.06120.lofi>