From owner-freebsd-arch Wed May 23 12:51: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B63937B424 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:51:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA32383; Wed, 23 May 2001 15:50:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:50:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200105231950.PAA32383@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: unit_list routines In-Reply-To: <50437.990647215@critter> References: <200105231944.f4NJiXF09637@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <50437.990647215@critter> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > If true, the rman code should have a big "XXX: rewrite" on top of it. You're not paying attention. The resource manager has no such problem -- sparse ranges like that are precisely what it was written for. I suggested that, if Brian was unhappy with the overhead of the resource manager, he should just keep a bitmap of available numbers. He responded with this strawman. I responded that his strawman was not reasonable. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message