From owner-freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org Sun Oct 2 22:25:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chromium@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B432DADAB61 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 22:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clutton@zoho.com) Received: from sender153-mail.zoho.com (sender153-mail.zoho.com [74.201.84.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88B92D1D for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 22:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clutton@zoho.com) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type:mime-version; b=OPgzz/z55nLWBapzIpKWmygbHMhdLuCRK8OXpYdbC+2Mi3dgxjyDptxFUNrplN7ocyxINqBnUI1h D7WwmAfYhnIn3VbQHZcj9Av00QYd5KiVCFqgGBO3Limoj6ovri11 Received: from [192.168.11.5] (mktechs.net [46.229.54.117]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1475447114933210.65253442675555; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 15:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1475447110.1390.60.camel@zoho.com> Subject: Re: Updated devel/icu, Chromium fails, can't upgrade From: clutton To: drhowarddrfine@charter.net, "'freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org'" Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 01:25:10 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1X+MhY4E0jsGmHR2Rui0" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 22:25:21 -0000 --=-1X+MhY4E0jsGmHR2Rui0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 14:40 -0600, drhowarddrfine@charter.net wrote: > Yes but then I'm running with a long list of vulnerabilities. Come to > think of it, do I care? I really didn't look into whether it's a big > concern or not. Well, then you should have being complained on outdated port not the icu issue, right? For now, you could update it as I offered you. Bringing new version wouldn't be hard, rene did the hardest part, and now it would be minor fixes. So, just wait. May be more then usual, since I asked to merge something I've done. --=-1X+MhY4E0jsGmHR2Rui0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJX8YlGAAoJEH2wP42yyP6QD7IP/jkMn+Obl4CAyPpSuFzDTLIY 7jq+8KMjRHTLVmZRgeggtZOEiYLW/dWIzau5RMONIhz9lsIPk+Uy/NMugD47oSnk xoYuuCa+FcUiOl+W5dBRKkG81Ciy3NSShnbQp95KPYQveUvUUIgS5sjSdzo1wKGY i9uWO7sUKyivOfVqx05KUlCaEF6kW7U2T0Rk80HyE7vXHIIsLyzPzoPG5snLH8Zq 0wcIgY3XymYQ34l/e7E4JVP7zqJpc7cdJ/GE8uZZI8U9oWokLyLYLuassND7chPJ moQmfqd/s8gcq0qJhOvZhLV4ThKOz6yHb2TV7vETVWydfJx4Vx5KPV9RGUTVLifM CobtHC9dT6INYisN+O75DVRdprcimvPcHacx8bVc6RRN+xmFw6E+iYr8pIFmvA5O jElIcHgQDm8NduRZYJlr6oXCkbCnkvK47A18hup1VGnNNX+2Oz4JZn1LX9AJyasA q12Yt3j3yZLlPlXtil27zaMOUvZSZfiIL47ykGHG68pCOXBju0wD8B2bEBuGMkXP x+J/AXeXSj9ELYqzhxCg4gWuRCZL3Mzll8lp+HH7t5xyqLXfkB3GretDzLmxp+nm JwDAu5JQB0HVL2ktv18z+i3UxllBn7GIgf1cLWeCIHsxipIMVDcHMokRGlrR7gBW 3T8qFnaK+Tyt6INQKfNZ =QBR1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1X+MhY4E0jsGmHR2Rui0--