From owner-freebsd-scsi Wed Feb 7 14:55:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-freebsd-scsi Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA04672 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 14:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA04666 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 14:55:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id XAA18050; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 23:52:02 +0100 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id XAA08522; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 23:52:02 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.3/8.6.9) id XAA06879; Wed, 7 Feb 1996 23:34:20 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199602072234.XAA06879@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: Patches from 2.1-RELEASE To: caussep@sphynx.fdn.fr (Philippe Causse) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 23:34:20 +0100 (MET) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, delaitt@cpc.wmin.ac.uk, jdp@polstra.com Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: from "Philippe Causse" at Feb 7, 96 10:49:26 am X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk As Philippe Causse wrote: > > Agreed! That's why I just quoted the bits relevant to SCSI-2 tape > positionning. At the end of this mail I quoted the head of the SCSI-2 > specs file, everything you'll need to know about "how to get the paper > version" is here :-) I think many people listening on this list do already have it. :) I've finally managed to print larger portions when i worked on the worm driver... > > (Sorry for not being constructive here, i simply didn't have the time > > yet to look after all this stuff, and it's unlikely that i will have > > it within the next couple of weeks. Alas.) > > As long as it is not deemed to go to /dev/null, fair enough! Yup, it's still sitting there, ``marked for later processing''. Sorry for the rush, i'm going to leave for some days of vacation over the weekend, and tomorrow will already be overloaded with paywork. So i suspect i won't get the time for a more detailed review until end of next week. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)