Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 08:21:26 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 216096] Few typos in comments in buf_ring.h Message-ID: <bug-216096-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216096 Bug ID: 216096 Summary: Few typos in comments in buf_ring.h Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: bltsrc@mail.ru r309414 sys/sys/buf_ring.h Used to return a buffer (most likely already there) * to the top od the ring. The caller should *not* * have used any dequeue to pull it out of the ring * but instead should have used the peek() function. * This is normally used where the transmit queue typo here -> * of a driver is full, and an MUBF must be returned. should be ... mbuf ..., not mubf * Most likely whats in the ring-buffer is what * is being put back (since it was not removed), but * sometimes the lower transmit function may have * done a pullup or other function that will have typo here -> * changed it. As an OPTIMZATION we always put it should be ... optimization(or optimisation) * back (since jhb says the store is probably cheaper), * if we have to do a multi-queue version we will need * the compare and an atomic. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216096-8>