Date: 24 Jul 2000 04:25:51 -0500 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" <lioux@uol.com.br> Cc: SADA Kenji <sada@bsdclub.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, trevor@jpj.net, girgen@partitur.se, obrien@NUXI.com Subject: Re: Kill Netscape us ports and version 4.08. (was Re: Netscape browsers us versions avail. abroad) Message-ID: <vqclmyr7ucg.fsf@bubble.didi.com> In-Reply-To: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira"'s message of "Sun, 23 Jul 2000 20:23:59 -0300" References: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007222157090.25361-100000@blues.jpj.net> <200007231554.AAA89214@home.bsdclub.org> <20000723202359.B901@Fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" <lioux@uol.com.br> * However, we should provide some alternative to the 128-bit * dilema as pointed out by Mr. Trevor. Perhaps, we could keep 4.73 Something like: .if defined(USE_WEAK_CRYPTO) DISTFILES= weak crypto version .else DISTFILES= strong crypto version .endif should be fine. I don't think we need separate ports. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqclmyr7ucg.fsf>