From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 23 06:52:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236101065672 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:52:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FB28FC12 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-196-27-202.dynamic.qsc.de [92.196.27.202]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6ED3EBDC; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n3N6qHjg001603; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:52:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:52:16 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Al Plant Message-Id: <20090423085216.8493171e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <49EFDB8A.80506@hdk5.net> References: <714DFCFC-9547-497D-A2C7-0BA10B39B901@mac.com> <49EFDB8A.80506@hdk5.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fritz , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Modern FreeBSD Installer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:52:24 -0000 On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:07:54 -1000, Al Plant wrote: > Gui installs have a tendency to hide things you need to tweak or alter > to suit a specific need. That's a point especially when you want to turn an older 150 MHz P1 into a worthful part of the IT society. :-) No, honestly: If the GUI installer just runs on a narrow subsets of up-to-date GPUs, there are major problems. Especially when a server has no GPU at all. Let me state this: correct screen detection is already a problem with "the big" X, how should "a small" installer get this right with its limited resources? Mind this: The installer runs in a very limited setting, while X can rely on an already running system. Good ways to go (for those who want it this way) are PC-BSD, DesktopBSD and FreeSBIE. > I find it fast and efficient the way it is. Which makes it modern, in my opinion. But hey, I'm old and old-fashioned anyway. :-) -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...