Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:21:49 +0700
From:      Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
To:        Hannes Mehnert <hannes@mehnert.org>
Cc:        freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-15?q?Port=E9?= <natbsd@instinctive.eu>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, Natacha
Subject:   Re: How can I help with thinkpad x220 issues?
Message-ID:  <201207040821.50387.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FF3512E.10908@mehnert.org>
References:  <20120523151357.GC97037@sigil.instinctive.eu> <201207032128.24837.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <4FF3512E.10908@mehnert.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Hannes,

On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 03:08:14 AM Hannes Mehnert wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>=20
> On 07/03/2012 16:28, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > On Tuesday, July 03, 2012 08:51:33 PM Ian Smith wrote:
> >> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:20:22 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >>  > On Tuesday, July 03, 2012 03:34:36 PM Natacha Port=E9 wrote:
> >>  > > > > $ sysctl dev.acpi_ibm
> >>  > > >=20
> >>  > > > I do not have anything with IBM or Lenovo.
> >>
> >> Is this a Thinkpad model that shows no benefits from loading acpi_ibm?
> >=20
> > I just loaded it to veryfy. There is no difference between loaded and n=
ot loaded. At least it does not do any harm. The sysctls also do not show u=
p after being loaded.
>=20
> I believe you've to patch acpi_ibm with the lenovo (LEN0068) identifier
> and recompile - see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/164=
538
>=20
I compiled it into the kernel but it did not make a difference.

Erich



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201207040821.50387.erichfreebsdlist>