From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 1 20:14:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16C31065672 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6209A8FC13 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so630208fxm.3 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:14:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LCdxLlPQzL20ZvI0L5eT1mP4HCdXmIKhRrmEQwHUpXU=; b=vd0jGllqJGsCgKglYm/R2aGHYnuF8jtUk342f+2DpLayKu360LwIVisQdrOBf8dtXA skTBq9mHccfXGOij5SCriohqzHqHKIIelCBlsoVwdtg6mmyQZM/FCZI8vRRZiHUA04wk NsfDLL1DN2XyEULSITS+KV39t3RDxG68yUbPU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KDmjtYNUpoePq5OVehm6sXGN+rvVS3krJDQKS0K6JOU0M4nfLdXNSGY3sQlYgeo6cd jbF9gJkUTtlShuAtjXuoMaVKiAkECyBGUexwI7cqD56boCtgP+oORcaSZSlboI6A/17c xaV70rJZor7XHqvjjnduQQ0Ks5Eks+/6gr4sE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.189.7 with SMTP id r7mr781124hbh.116.1265055287151; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:14:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:14:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Vinicius Abrahao Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: gone. All welcome X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:14:49 -0000 On 2/1/10, b. f. wrote: >>I found another port that shows a little error when replace utmp.h by >> utmpx.h. >>Is security/ipsec-tools > > This was discovered shortly after Ed's initial changes -- Ed furnished > a patch, and the maintainer was notified on 15 Jan. 2009, although I > don't think a PR was filed. I attach the patch for your convenience. > > b. > Er, that should have been 15 Jan. 2010, of course. I'm still stuck in last year. And note that the patch should only be applied if ${OSVERSION} >= 900007