From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 22 11:51:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74BCEAD; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753D48FC0C; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9MBppVu032097; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:51:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <50853357.4010007@qeng-ho.org> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:51:51 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121013 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: pkgng and the old pkg_* programs References: <50842C6E.9070800@qeng-ho.org> <50843299.6030407@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50843299.6030407@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:51:53 -0000 On 10/21/12 18:36, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 21/10/2012 18:10, Arthur Chance wrote: >> Now that portmaster officially supports pkgng I've converted to using >> it. Is there any reason to keep the old pkg_* programs around, or can I >> delete them and add WITHOUT_PKGTOOLS to my /etc/src.conf? I'm running >> RELEASE-9.0 on amd64 and will update to REL-9.1 as soon as it arrives if >> that matters. > > There is no particularly good reason to keep pkg_tools around once > you've made the switch to pkgng. pkgng should provide replacements for > all the pkg_tool functionality and slot into its place quite smoothly. > > However, I'm not sure that there's been adequate testing on a > pkg_tools-free setup, so it is not entirely outside the bounds of > possibility that you might run into some odd problems. If you do, > please report what happens, as that's definitely a bug that needs fixing. Will do. Thanks to all who worked on pkgng.