From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 04:50:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4D716A416 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 04:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E65440E7 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 04:50:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08768B822; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 00:50:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFDFB81F; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 00:50:11 -0400 (EDT) References: <20060629230309.GA12773@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20060630041733.GA4941@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <20060702162942.D1103@ganymede.hub.org> <20060703042010.GG37822@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Kostik Belousov Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:50:11 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, User Freebsd Subject: Re: NFS Locking Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 04:50:13 -0000 Kostik Belousov writes: > I think that then 6.2 and 6.3 is not for you either. Problems > cannot be fixed until enough information is given. I am trying.. but so far only other users who are having the same problem are commenting on this and other simmilar threads. We just need some guidance.. Mark gave me a URL to turn on debugging and volunteered ot give me some pointers.. I will try, but I will likely try on my own time, on my own machines.. I can not tell the owner of the company I work for to let me "try".. or "play around" in production machines.. as we loose customers because of current problems with the 6.X line. > Since nobody except you experience that problems (at least, only you notified > about the problem existence) Did you miss the part of: > User Freebsd writes: >>Since there are several of us experiencing what looks to be the same sort >>of deadlock issue, I beseech you not to give up I am not the only one reporting or having the issue. > Is this for intr mounts? "intr" ? > improved handling of signals in nfs client. If you could test it, that > would be useful. Does it matter if the OS is i386 or am64? Have an amd64 machine I can more easily play with... with no risk to production.