From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Dec 11 3: 9: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from workhorse.iMach.com (workhorse.iMach.com [206.127.77.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BEA37B405 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:09:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (forrestc@localhost) by workhorse.iMach.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA14516; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 04:01:46 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 04:01:46 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" To: "Tolpanov, Dmitry" Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Router based on FreeBSD. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Tolpanov, Dmitry wrote: > I've got a very complex problem so every advice is appreciated. > I've got a router on 4.3-STABLE FreeBSD. It's got hardware (in short): > - Intel Pentium III 500 MHz > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX > - NIC 3Com 900 Combo 10baseT/UTP > - NIC 3Com 900 Combo 10baseT/UTP > > Sometimes through this router network works slowly and it is natural > right thing. Therefore we are going to split router on two. Define slowly. Can you see added latency across the router? Personally I'd switch all the cards out for Intel, but that is my preference - and I can't say it would help at all. - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749 http://www.imach.com/ Helena, MT 59604 Home of PacketFlux Technogies and BackupDNS.com (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Protect your personal freedoms - visit http://www.lp.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message