From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 03:21:46 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 046DE779;
 Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:21:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22c.google.com (mail-qa0-x22c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22c])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B24A8971;
 Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:21:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w8so5063898qac.3;
 Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:21:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=cG6cBMrclQkp5FCKx0KpNV6uyfA8VZKDikVk9J2EdGM=;
 b=moRGCgLOKmeDvdYnGjAKarPI90axjsgGbWuMYjoe5yO8zTslhG7qITKXt+3UlcDNtt
 UCQG00J4TiVVWWPLuAFNxkIkdw1NNTQkvTAmQMf6LPyHWmhpsUdP8nxF3zTlz+aUOfO5
 qee8ivHOe3PDe5DP/GJHv9BWgA/75Qz5xL4tr4N4Ip48naUrpkHEvBmPZF+2HhnWH3r7
 8YWJr7NBHRugZulqZrdHQbi5MtWwwaUrrD8m33pnqJS/PqnCb2u1/OQY2Wooq9jmMIqd
 JIzM+wZ/wpbj08bXiQys1ecYDVw7Ap7q1VnRUDJRD26hoVd/fVmiGtQf3Fwz+CXCtuIf
 Tljw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.147.197 with SMTP id m5mr3067026qav.51.1421205704938;
 Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:21:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.39.2 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 19:21:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54b5d299.4914980a.61cd.43a6@mx.google.com>
References: <54b33bfa.e31b980a.3e5d.ffffc823@mx.google.com>
 <54B4AE55.9090205@platinum.linux.pl>
 <54b5d299.4914980a.61cd.43a6@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 05:21:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+7WWScVQ9LwQQ3NR8ipkdxroqdg26Q2dB__+2wRr_0kPmJODQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ChaCha8/12/20 and GEOM ELI tests
From: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>
To: Rozhuk.IM@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org,
 Adam Nowacki <nowakpl@platinum.linux.pl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 03:21:46 -0000

> Depends on the capabilities of the attacker.
>
> To be able to continuously read encrypted sectors for data collection is too much.
>

When talking about disk encryption the first assumption is that the
attacker always has this capability, even with so much power the
attacker shouldn't be able to break the encryption scheme. If he can
then the encryption scheme is not secure.

-Kimmo