Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:50:59 -0500 From: "Don Wilde" <Don@Silver-Lynx.com> To: "Doug Barton" <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: DANIEL MAGNUSZEWSKI <dmagnuszewski@mandtbank.com>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making FreeBSD More Lean/Efficient On Older Laptop... Message-ID: <eefa2c8b0607251350v749cd4ecv9831e578168bc29a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <eefa2c8b0607251349w4cbaaaacq96339b43043ab485@mail.gmail.com> References: <s4c641a6.030@comrcm01intgwia.mandtbank.com> <44C67B77.6080602@FreeBSD.org> <eefa2c8b0607251349w4cbaaaacq96339b43043ab485@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
And no, FVWM is not compliant with either schema. You're definitely back in the apps of X11, not CD blasters and Noatun. On 7/25/06, Don Wilde <Don@silver-lynx.com> wrote: > > Right, and I think WindowMaker 0.92 is relatively Gnome-compliant. Of > course, you have to realize hat when you enable such features you've just > made everything dog-slow again. My EMACS lost about 40% of its (apparent) > responsiveness when I built it in a gnome environment. > > > On 7/25/06, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org > wrote: > > > > DANIEL MAGNUSZEWSKI wrote: > > > All, > > > > > > Thanks for the pointers. I do want a desktop manager. > > > > The combination of windowmaker and rox-filer makes a nice lightweight > > wm+desktop environment. Add wdm and you've you've got all the > > conveniences > > of modern desktops without the overhead (IMO). > > > > hth, > > > > Doug > > > > -- > > > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mobile-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > > " > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eefa2c8b0607251350v749cd4ecv9831e578168bc29a>