From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 2 23:14: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF7137BA4C; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 23:14:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from almanac.yi.org (pm006-029.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.81.13]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA01927; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 02:14:00 -0400 Received: by almanac.yi.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7CAA019A6; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 02:13:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 02:13:19 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: FreeBSD Ports Cc: vanilla@FreeBSD.org, foxfair@FreeBSD.org Subject: 'outta-port' collection on freebsd.sinica.edu.tw Message-ID: <20000603021319.W32212@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, I've recently learned (actually, "been reminded" is more accurate) of the "outta-port" collection maintained by Taiwanese developers on freebsd.sinica.edu.tw (which appears to contain some 20-25 ports). So, what I'd like to know is this: Why are these ports not being maintained on the primary FreeBSD ports tree? Thanks, -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message