From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Apr 11 00:43:51 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA15644
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 11 Apr 1995 00:43:51 -0700
Received: from dtr.com (dtr.rain.com [204.119.8.19])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA15630
          for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 1995 00:43:41 -0700
From: bmk@dtr.com
Received: (from bmk@localhost) by dtr.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA09591; Tue, 11 Apr 1995 00:37:17 -0700
Message-Id: <199504110737.AAA09591@dtr.com>
Subject: Re: subnet routing on FreeBSD 2.0 (950322-SNAP, et al)6
To: john@starfire.mn.org (John Lind)
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 1995 00:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199504110547.AAA15087@starfire.mn.org> from "John Lind" at Apr 11, 95 00:47:15 am
Reply-To: bmk@dtr.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 749       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> I have make my first to set up a network which uses subnet-based
> routing, and it has not worked as I have expected.  At this point,
> I am unable to determine whether the fault is my understanding, or
> the code.  By intuition, I have discovered something that works,
> even though my logic says that it is wrong -- I tried it on a hunch
> to exploit what seemed to be a bug in the behavior.

> If there is someone who might be willing to take a little time to
> expand my understanding and confidence so that I may see where the
> problem lies, I'd greatly appreciate it.

Gladly, if you can be a little more specific.

I've got a subnetted network running here under 950322-SNAP - works
great.

I assume that you've read the relavent RFC's?