From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 17:41:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03CD16A42D; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca [128.100.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E63A43D58; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from fields.fields.utoronto.ca (fields.localdomain [192.168.216.11]) by fileserver.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields 6.0) with ESMTP id j8BHfB0r031742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:41:11 -0400 Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by fields.fields.utoronto.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Fields WS 6.0) with ESMTP id j8BHfB6P004778; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:41:11 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1ABCF51374; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:41:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:41:11 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Roman Bogorodskiy Message-ID: <20050911174110.GB58801@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200509091534.j89FY2Qi043829@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050909170934.GA42230@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050910044627.GA761@lame.novel.ru> <20050910052129.GA49500@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050910123802.GA669@lame.novel.ru> <20050910175757.GA52565@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050911112816.GA755@lame.novel.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050911112816.GA755@lame.novel.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Roman Bogorodskiy , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/gnutls Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:41:14 -0000 --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 03:28:16PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Kris wrote: >=20 > > > Even if there were, I think it's quite obvious that port which has be= en > > > removed from the ports tree should be deinstalled from user's system,= =20 > > > isn't it? BTW, portupgrade notes when there are such kind of ports in > > > the system. > > >=20 > > > I think the proper solution is deinstalling obsolete port (i.e. gnutl= s-devel > > > in our case) from the system, but not CONFLICTing with dead ports' gh= osts. > > > And Porters Handbook doesn't say we should CONFLICT with nonexistent = ports. > > >=20 > > > Am I missing something? > >=20 > > The point of CONFLICTS is to prevent two ports from spamming each > > other with the same installed files. That's exactly what would happen > > if someone still has gnutls-devel installed (it was only removed a few > > days ago) and tries to install this one, so it makes perfect sense to > > me that you should keep it there. >=20 > Done. But how long should it be kept? Probably at least one release cycle..it's harmless to keep it there. Kris --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDJGw2Wry0BWjoQKURAtOfAKCI/wdVO1WAm207uV+wpY9qMXdp9wCeL/bq Grn5kK+974A2QJwvjvbDtww= =cY8t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9--