From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Jul  3 04:11:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA03969
          for security-outgoing; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 04:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.cs.msu.su (laskavy@redsun.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA03962
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 04:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from laskavy@localhost) by ns.cs.msu.su (8.8.6/8.6.12) id PAA01774; Thu, 3 Jul 1997 15:11:19 +0400 (DST)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 15:11:19 +0400 (DST)
Message-Id: <199707031111.PAA01774@ns.cs.msu.su>
From: "Sergei S. Laskavy" <laskavy@cs.msu.su>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Why perl is still setuid?
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

What do you think about buffer overflows in Perl 4.x and 5.x ?