From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 12:23:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABFB1065678 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AD48FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOXBd-000437-OM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:23:17 -0700 Message-ID: <18753406.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <18742235.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl References: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> <48909534.9040608@FreeBSD.org> <18737322.post@talk.nabble.com> <4890A25D.3060606@FreeBSD.org> <18742235.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:23:19 -0000 I'm now wondering why CPUTYPE=core2 is supposed to work in -current. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10783746.html http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10787174.html http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-GSoC2007%3A-cnst-sensors.2007-08-20.patch-p12334133.html I'm particular interested in Penryn instructions support. Jakub Lach wrote: > > > > Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >> >> Jakub Lach wrote: >>> >>> >>> Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >>>> Jakub Lach wrote: >>>>> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >>>>> gcc43 as >>>>> base. >>>> I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by >>>> the GPLv3. >>> >>> Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is >>> going to >>> be omitted? >> >> There is basically no chance the GCC developers will reconsider their >> decision to relicense GCC 4.3 to GPLv3. >> >>> If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? >> >> The existing gcc 4.2 will be supported for some time by the gcc >> developers. In the meantime hopefully llvm/clang will mature enough to >> provide an alternative. It is already quite far along and has >> significant resources behind it (apple, etc). >> >> Kris >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > Thank you very much for all answers. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18753406.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.