Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2022 19:12:08 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> Cc: Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: af3c78886fd8 - main - Alter the prototype of qsort_r(3) to match POSIX, which adopted the glibc-based interface. Message-ID: <Y0HLiH8He4c%2BLVKO@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGMYy3sFJuNO3ebEGOsuOqruTMV9AUGrKZeEjBr%2Bu=vUbLjd8Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <202209302230.28UMUq4I029171@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <Y0AlrfmliBbu/t73@FreeBSD.org> <CAGMYy3sFJuNO3ebEGOsuOqruTMV9AUGrKZeEjBr%2Bu=vUbLjd8Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 11:16:22AM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 6:12 AM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Can you elaborate on technical side of things a bit? Is GNU > > qsort_r(3) interface, while incompatible, better than ours in > > 1-to-1 comparison, leaving the grief of not going with our > > older one aside? Thanks, > > It's already explained in the commit message. Well, no, it is not -- meaning while it explained the rationale for the change, it did not answer my question. Pedro's link to the Austin Group bugtracker helped though. :-) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Y0HLiH8He4c%2BLVKO>