From owner-cvs-all Fri Jul 13 11:38:11 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16C737B403; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:38:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6DIc4S45628; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:38:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Message-Id: <200107131838.f6DIc4S45628@freefall.freebsd.org> From: "David E. O'Brien" Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 11:38:04 -0700 (PDT) To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_usrreq.c X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG obrien 2001/07/13 11:38:04 PDT Modified files: sys/netinet tcp_usrreq.c Log: Bump net.inet.tcp.sendspace to 32k and net.inet.tcp.recvspace to 65k. This should help us in nieve benchmark "tests". It seems a wide number of people think 32k buffers would not cause major issues, and is in fact in use by many other OS's at this time. The receive buffers can be bumped higher as buffers are hardly used and several research papers indicate that receive buffers rarely use much space at all. Submitted by: Leo Bicknell <20010713101107.B9559@ussenterprise.ufp.org> Agreed to in principle by: dillon (at the 32k level) Revision Changes Path 1.64 +3 -3 src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message