Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 21:22:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ports Options Paper Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009082120001.3399-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000908230629.I632@radon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:53:48PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > The libraries have different names (libqt vs libqt2). If you want one, you
> > use libqt.*, or libqt.[3-5] or whatever, if you want the other you use
> > libqt2.*, if you want either, you use libqt{,2}.*
> ^
>
> > I don't see the problem.
>
> Where will that number come from?
Err, when you have a port which works with qt2, you add it in. If qt2 is
different enough to qt that it should be considered a separate package,
then you have to deal with it separately. I dont see how this stuff can be
made to work automatically.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009082120001.3399-100000>