From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 3 18:27:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.plug.cx (unix-gw.gihs.sa.edu.au [203.63.40.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3871137B410 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 18:27:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrew.reid@plug.cx) Received: from [172.16.1.1] (firewall.gihs.sa.edu.au [192.168.1.1]) by mail.plug.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BAD2B7DE for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 11:18:44 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Static NAT using natd From: Andrew Reid To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release) Date: 04 Jul 2001 10:47:32 +0930 Message-Id: <994209462.6462.14.camel@percible.alfred.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello All, From the documentation that I've read, it's possible to do static NAT using natd. However, I have a /26 subnet that I need to run static NAT on. Ie, I want connections from my (internal) mail server to be run out through 1.2.3.1, and connections from my (internal) web server to be run out through 1.2.3.2. I know this is quite trivial using IPF (well, IPNAT), but it seems to be quite difficult to do (with natd) when there are 60-odd addresses, each with their own pathways. Have I missed something that can allow me to use natd to do what I've outlined above? If so, can anyone suggest any documentation that could help in this circumstance? If it's not really feasable, how are others doing it? Thanks in advance, - andrew -- void signature () { cout << "Andrew Reid -- andrew.reid@plug.cx" << endl ; cout << "Cell: +61 401 946 813" << endl; cout << "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur" << endl; } To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message