From owner-freebsd-bluetooth@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 22 07:50:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F1A106566B for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:50:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plunky@rya-online.net) Received: from smtp02.one2one.net (smtp02.one2one.net [149.254.192.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E988FC16 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plunky@rya-online.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by localhost.t-mobile.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LwXE3-0001Sb-Eu; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:50:35 +0100 Received: from localhost.t-mobile.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpbeckt01 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05597-01; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:50:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.214.201.207] (helo=rya-online.net) by localhost.t-mobile.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LwXE1-0001SW-RL; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:50:35 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 225 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:49:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:49:29 +0100 (BST) To: Maksim Yevmenkin In-Reply-To: References: <1240311202.361300.1366.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> <1240352254.082638.416.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <1240386569.369073.696.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> From: Iain Hibbert X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at example.com X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: plunky@rya-online.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on localhost.t-mobile.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libhci update X-BeenThere: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Using Bluetooth in FreeBSD environments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:50:41 -0000 On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > > In bt_devreq() you used buf[320] is that truly enough? I didn't check that > > part of the radio specification dedicated to baseband packet size but the > > Broadcom BCM2045B device in my laptop claims to have max_acl_size of 1017.. > > yes, but we are not dealing with acl packets in bt_devreq() only > commands and event that have up to 255 bytes of payload. Doh > please see attached revised patch. I've got no more comments here iain