From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 14:17:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593B816A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 14:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13906.mail.yahoo.com (web13906.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 362C043D1D for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 14:17:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scosol@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040409211707.81641.qmail@web13906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.242.144.226] by web13906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:17:07 PDT Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 14:17:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Nathan Seven To: Kevin Oberman In-Reply-To: <20040409203537.EECE75D07@ptavv.es.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: avleeuwen@piwebs.com cc: Atte Peltomaki Subject: Re: Future of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 21:17:09 -0000 --- Kevin Oberman wrote: > > The assumption that servers don't need ACPI is > simply untrue. More and > more newer BIOSes simply will not boot without ACPI. > Since ACPI takes > over the functions of APM, too often people assume > that it does nothing > else, when it may well do a great many more things, > many well outside > the bounds of power management and essential to > system operation. You're right- I was thinking about *my* client's serverside usage (UP, non bleeding edge HW by any means) But really- modern UP machines really won't boot without ACPI? I was unaware of that... ===== -- live- http://www.scosol.org/ to- AIM: IMFDUP _-jupiter accepts your offer-_