From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 08:31:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355DC1065670 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AAA8FC18 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n1Q8V7gf050199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:31:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n1Q8V7Hh050197; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:31:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA01103; Thu, 26 Feb 09 00:27:56 PST Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:27:43 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd@richardleestockton.org Message-Id: <49a6527f.hG52wuvGEM9dAIqe%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20090225173445.050d1ef8@adhost.com> In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20090225173445.050d1ef8@adhost.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk/drive-bay problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:31:08 -0000 > g_vfs_done():da4s1d[READ(offset=261868847104, length=16384)]error = 5 ... > 1. This only happens on drive-bay 4. If I swap the 300 Gig drives > around, they are all happy in any drive-bay but number 4 ... > > 2. The old 145Gig drives work perfectly in any bay, including bay 4. > > ... Why would one (proven good) drive fail in that slot, while the > other (also proven good) drive succeeds. The only difference is > the size and speed (145 vs 300, 10k vs 15k). Any chance bay 4 has a minor wiring problem, like a broken ground or three, causing an impedance bump? Such things might just barely work at 10k, but fail at higher transfer speeds.