From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 10:17:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E743C755 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@fubar.geek.nz) Received: from smtp5.clear.net.nz (smtp5.clear.net.nz [203.97.33.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B68B15F for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxin1-orange.clear.net.nz (lb2-srcnat.clear.net.nz [203.97.32.237]) by smtp5.clear.net.nz (CLEAR Net Mail) with ESMTP id <0MGR00D5DLXHLE40@smtp5.clear.net.nz> for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:17:42 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from 202-0-48-19.paradise.net.nz (HELO localhost) ([202.0.48.19]) by smtpin1.paradise.net.nz with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:17:40 +1300 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:17:33 +1300 From: Andrew Turner Subject: Re: MK_ARM_EABI can't be set by a user In-reply-to: To: Alie Tan Message-id: <20130117231733.00ccee3e@fubar.geek.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Pirate: Arrrr References: Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:18:00 -0000 On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:50:07 +0800 Alie Tan wrote: > Hi, > > I got this error while compiling kernel-toolchain with r245541 src: > "/usr/src_eabi/share/mk/bsd.own.mk", line 427: MK_ARM_EABI can't be > set by a user. > *** [kernel-toolchain] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src_eabi. > > and I have WITH_ARM_EABI="YES" on my src.conf You didn't mention which branch this is on. If it is on the arm_eabi branch it was broken after an MFC where ARM_EABI was both enabled and disabled. If it was on head I haven't finished merging the support yet. I'll send a heads up when head it is in a testable state. In either case you either don't need WITH_ARM_EABI on the arm_eabi branch or will find things are broken with it enabled on head. Andrew